I argued much with
Tinkerbell in order to to do this one. It was the first portrait in which I painted a background (Jeez, that was tough!).
I'll start with the subjective context. When we were toghether, me and
Makel, we loved to go over to this pizza restaurant in the city where she lived. It was great pizza at low prices. The place, with it's huge windows and open space, seemed to remind me of
Hopper's
Chop Suey painting when the four o'clock sun hit the windows.

Nowadays, when I remember
Makel, I can't avoid picuring her in that place, smiling at me and chatting about all the pointless philosophy we used to talk about. Happy moments amidst all the arguing we did.
Of course, reality was a whole different thing. She no longer dressed like that, or had time to go to that place again. She was now a busy law student who was also taking care of her soon-to-be fiancée. So I had to meet her somewhere, photograph her, then ride to her city to photograph the restaurant. All that coupled with the fact that I wasn't painting in canvas. But that's a more technical side. I'll explain.
I wanted to paint a portrait to explicit how we view images. The difference between figure and background.
Makel was painted in two layers of acrylic. On one layer, I painted the restaurant, minus our table and the area that would be accupied by her. These would go on the other layer. See, we usually tell foreground from background throught perspective (be it geometric or atmospheric) and by logicaly understanding wich layer is on top. Confused? Take a look at this
painting by Malevich. How do you know the yellow figure is in front of the red line? It's a layer on top of another layer.
When I separated foreground and background, this whole experience grew stronger. This painting has an amazing depth. First, because even though at first you cannot consciously notice the two layers of acrylic, your eye notices a difference. And it brings the first layer forward. Also, the first acrylic adds a haze to the second layer, like a fog, turning pure black into a grayish thing. That's atmospheric perspective (See
Da Vinci's paintings....). Finally,
Makel's image is in perfect focus, while the background is a little fuzzy. That's what happens in the human eye: you can't focus everything at once (this comes from my photography lessons at the advertising course: thanks,
Luli!).
Quite frankly, I don't think I'll paint anything this enticing in the next two months...